David Silver and Lasse Espeholt on superintelligence from scratch
The DeepMind researchers behind AlphaZero left to found Ineffable Intelligence on one bet: that superintelligence will come from an agent that learns everything from its own experience in simulation, not from human data, and that the safe way there is to run the science in simulation first.
Learning From Experience
Silver's bet from his AlphaGo PhD to today: intelligence comes from a system that learns by doing and discovers for itself, not one that is taught from our data.
to me that is the essence of what it will take to get to super intelligence like a system that can just keep learning and discovering knowledge forever.
The Other Lamppost
Silver left DeepMind over direction, not resources: he thinks the road to superintelligence does not run through LLM products, so it deserved a lab built entirely around the other approach.
I have a really strong belief about how um we can go beyond where we are today um with AI and all the way to super intelligence and the path that I believe in um doesn't actually go through LLM based products as an intermediate point.
Depth And Breadth
A super learner is defined on two axes: depth (start from nothing, discover far past human knowledge) and breadth (drop it into any world, simulated, digital or physical, and it still learns).
in the depth dimension, it should be something that can start from not knowing anything at all and can go all the way through to discovering things that go way beyond what humans know.
Let Go Of The Human Data
The AlphaZero lesson, made concrete: AlphaGo took two years of human-guided work to beat a world champion; once the team dropped the human data, AlphaZero relearned the game and beat the best chess AI ever made in four hours.
it took four hours to beat the world champion, the best ever AI that had ever been created.
Simple Rewards, Emergent Worlds
Silver's team does not hand-craft tasks or write a reward that spells out 'science' or 'language'; they drop agents into rich simulated worlds they call crucibles, give one simple objective, and let complexity emerge, the way evolution did.
So all in the pursuit of relatively simple goals this incredible complexity emerged.
Rediscovering Language
Silver argues human language may be the wrong substrate for thought: start an agent from our words and it inherits our biases, so he wants agents to discover their own, possibly richer, way to reason.
maybe our agents would believe that the world was flat or or that the diseases were caused by uh the four humors
Run The Science In Simulation
Today's alignment leans on reading an agent's words, but as agents grow more capable they learn to say one thing and do another; Silver's answer is to study superintelligence in simulation first and only move into the real world once that science says it is safe.
They're going to start to learn to say one thing and act in a different way.
The Right Time To Bet
The approach is old; what changed is compute. With one of the largest GPU clusters on Google Cloud and a team of twenty, Silver, who says he called the timing of computer Go to the year, now puts strong evidence within a year and a true superintelligence in about three.
I originally thought within three to five years. Um my timelines have accelerated a little bit. So I'm gonna say three years