Gary Dickerson on why AI comes down to tokens per second per watt
Applied Materials' CEO reframes the AI race from chip design to materials physics: the real constraint is energy-efficient compute (tokens per second per watt), built from the transistor and wiring materials his company makes for over 60% of AI chips.
The Race Is Tokens Per Second Per Watt
Dickerson collapses the AI contest into one metric, <strong>tokens per second per watt</strong>, set by the atomic-scale materials in the transistor and the wiring.
There's a technical term on tokens per second per watt. How fast you can process the data, those are innovations in the transistor, and the materials that enable that are created by applied materials.
Over 60% of AI-Chip Materials
Because <strong>over 60% of the materials in an AI chip</strong> come from Applied, it sits upstream of the compute shortage, invisible to buyers but load-bearing for builders.
Over 60% of the materials that are in these AI chips are created by Applied Materials.
The Interconnect Is the New Bottleneck
Energy efficiency now turns on pushing data across <strong>thousands of miles of wiring</strong> inside a package with almost no resistance, not on the transistor alone.
In some of these advanced packages, you can have thousands of miles of wiring, and you're moving that data in incredibly high speeds with almost no resistance. That's what determines energy efficiency and power consumption.
AI Building the Machines That Build AI
Applied runs AI across its own R&D and operations, claiming <strong>50% faster on key technologies and 40 times on some tasks</strong>.
In some cases, 50% faster with key technologies that we're innovating and developing and applied materials. In some cases, we're improving task 40 times.
Demand Too Fast to Forecast
Dickerson <strong>refused a specific forecast</strong> because demand is changing too fast to pin a point on, yet still committed to doubling output in two years.
we didn't give a specific forecast because it's changing so quickly.
A Bet on Demand, Not Valuations
Asked about the casino charge against AI investors, Dickerson <strong>sidestepped valuations and pointed at unbuilt demand</strong> from agentic and physical AI.
I see so many extremely valuable applications that are in the pipeline that are going to consume more compute demand.