Aman Singh on running a firm where agents prompt people
Aman Singh, who leads AI at the AI-native wealth firm Arca, explains how owning the harness, persistent client memory, deterministic guardrails, and edge-based injection defenses let agents run proactive, multi-day financial workflows with a human in the loop for anything that moves money.
We're not a SaaS company. We're the firm.
<strong>Arca isn't selling agent software; it's the wealth-management firm itself</strong> — which lets it standardize how the work happens so agents can run it.
We're actually not a SaaS company. We are we are the firm ourselves.
Agents prompt the people, not the reverse
<strong>At Arca the agents prompt the people</strong>, running proactively 24/7 and pulling in a human advisor only at the step that needs one.
Agents prompt people more than people prompt agents and it is a proactive kind of service that is running for them 24/7
Work spans days; a fresh agent wakes to each signal
Servicing a client's tax bill can span 10 days, so <strong>a persistent memory system lets a fresh agent wake up to each new signal</strong> and resume where the work left off.
there's like a fresh agent that wakes up to figure out what this means
Guardrails sit at the edges, and they're deterministic
<strong>Safety restrictions are fully deterministic and take the decision off the agent</strong> — anything that moves money, liquidates assets, or contacts a client stops at a human.
we have strict guardrails around human in the loop for things that would either move money or liquidate assets
Treat every email, doc, and call as an injection target
Emails, documents, and phone calls are all prompt-injection targets, so <strong>Arca verifies at the edges — scanning what comes in and checking what goes out for PII and exfiltration</strong>.
there's emails coming in, documents coming in, phone calls being made, which are targets for prompt injection
Own the harness; your benchmarks beat the leaderboard
<strong>Arca owns a model-agnostic harness and lets its own internal benchmarks, not public leaderboards, guide model choice</strong>, swapping out any model that proves too slow or too costly in practice.
despite the external benchmarks claiming great things for Luna, it didn't really quite work out for us
Models will confidently use the wrong year's tax brackets
Finance models answer with confident but stale facts, so <strong>a decision model detects when financial rigor is needed and nudges the model to a verified knowledge base</strong>.
models will very happily use the tax brackets from 2025
Product feedback becomes evals, but a human gates the change
Product feedback is paired with the agent's trace and a nightly meta-agent proposes harness changes, but <strong>a human engineer is still in the loop before any prompt change ships</strong> because agents overfit each fix into the whole prompt.
every little fix becomes the whole prompt